Proposed wildlife district in urban LA draws debate over saving crucial habitat – Daily News

For decades, homes and wildlife have coexisted in Southern California mountains and hills, where residents easily recall their first encounter with a bobcat who jumped their fence, a bear who wandered into their backyard, or a mountain lion who crossed a popular trail. But due to widespread development that co-existence may end, with biologists and environmentalists warning that construction in desirable neighborhoods threatens corridors that are crucial to wildlife.

Wildlife corridors create a path for deer, bears, bobcats and other animals to move around in urban areas and to search for food even as climate change, drought and overdevelopment push animals from their traditional habitats.

Mountain lion P-23 crosses a road in the Santa Monica Mountains National Recreation Area on July 10, 2013. Los Angeles and Mumbai, India are the world’s only megacities of 10 million-plus where large felines breed, hunt and maintain territory within urban boundaries . Long-term studies in both cities have examined how the big cats prowl through their urban jungles, and how people can best live alongside them. (National Park Service via AP)

“The wildlife corridor system is like your body’s circulatory system,” said Paul Edelman, deputy director of natural resources and planning at the Santa Monica Mountains Conservancy. “In some places, you’ve got bigger arteries but in some places you have very narrow ones. … If you block connection, you sever the system. Whatever is on one side of that blockage, dies.”

Although wild lands and residential areas have been intermixed for a long time, he said, the system is fragile.

A proposed ordinance rolled out by Los Angeles city planners this year seeks to protect habitat connectivity in the eastern Santa Monica Mountains which are bordered by the 405 and 101 freeways and partially bordered on the south by Sunset Boulevard. The proposed Wildlife District would directly impact hilly communities in the Hollywood Hills, Hollywood, Bel Air, Beverly Crest, Laurel Canyon, Sherman Oaks and Studio City. The southern border of the proposed district follows a stair-stepping line just north of Franklin Avenue, Hollywood Boulevard, Sunset Boulevard and smaller streets in Beverly Hills.

The proposed ordinance follows the 2016 Wildlife Pilot Study released after Los Angeles City Councilman Paul Koretz introduced a motion to balance wildlife habitat and private property development.

While the concept of protecting habitats from development is not rare, experts say LA’s proposed concept is unique and detailed.

In recent years, laws that address connectivity in urban areas have been gaining steam across the country.

The recently passed Florida Wildlife Corridor Act specifies a network of green space for wildlife that stretches across 18 million acres. The ordinance was drafted in response to the risk of extinction of the Florida panther, which since 1972 has been on the US endangered species list. In Vermont, so-called “Special Features Overlay zones,” ensure the protection of ecological resources and include wetlands, meadowlands, steep slopes and the forested area used by deer.

The Ventura County Board of Supervisors voted in 2017 to direct its planning department to create the Habitat Connectivity and Wildlife Movement Corridors, encompassing 420,000 acres or nearly 30% of Ventura County.

Still, the proposed Los Angeles ordinance, along with the protections in Ventura County, contain some of the most comprehensive and detailed laws in the nation, said SC Wildlands director Kristeen Penrod, a connectivity specialist for The Center for Large Landscape Conservation who is working with the government of Tanzania to establish wildlife corridors there.

If the ordinance is approved by the Los Angeles City Council, it would place limits on future construction in the Wildlife District. Owners of existing homes wouldn’t be affected if they don’t make major changes to their structures. But homeowners who decide to add a floor or knock down more than 70% of their house would need to acquire a new building permit. They would also need to install wildlife-friendly fencing around their homes.

Southern California is one of 25 “global biodiversity hotspots” in the world, which means it has a high number of species that occur nowhere else in the world. As climate change progresses, Penrod said, connected habitats will be highly important as species try to move closer to the coasts, where temperatures are cooler.

“All those juveniles have to be able to move somewhere and often offspring don’t share the same home range as their parents,” Penrod said. “They have to go somewhere else. That’s why these movement corridors are so important.”

Edelman at the Santa Monica Mountains Conservancy said he couldn’t “think of anything this comprehensive in California, that gets into the kind of fine details” as the ordinance now on the Los Angeles Planning Department’s desk.

On Wednesday, July 13, more than 200 people joined a lively 4.5-hour virtual public hearing hosted by the Los Angeles Planning Department so the public could share their thoughts about the ordinance. The crowd was divided, with passionate arguments from both sides.

One resident said the law could potentially strip him of the ability to retire or pay for the education of his children. Other residents expressed concerns that they did not have enough time to study the proposal and its impact on their properties.

Dan Harrison, a resident who could potentially be impacted, said he supported biodiversity and protecting wildlife and mitigating climate change. However, he felt there was a disconnect between some of the restrictions in the ordinance and those goals.

“I have done everything possible to reduce my carbon footprint, but this proposal is taking off my private property rights,” Harrison said. “It’s great to say that people should have open spaces, (but) there should be a respect for private property rights that I think is lacking in some of this one-size-fits-all ordinance.”

Allison McCracken, another resident, criticized the level of outreach to residents. She added that the ordinance “introduces the most radical property regulations the hills have ever seen.”

Proponents of the ordinance encouraged city planners to make the proposed district in the Santa Monica Mountains a sanctuary for wildlife.

Steve Winter, photographed mountain lion P-22 in front of the Hollywood sign, is videoed by Sharon Guynup following a groundbreaking for a bridge over the 101 Freeway to allow mountain lions and other animals to move across the freeway, Friday, April 22, 2022 , in Agoura Hills.  (Photo by Michael Owen Baker, contributing photographer)
Steve Winter, photographed mountain lion P-22 in front of the Hollywood sign, is videoed bySharon Guynup following a groundbreaking for a bridge over the 101 Freeway to allow mountain lions and other animals to move across the freeway, Friday, April 22, 2022, in Agoura Hills. (Photo by Michael Owen Baker, contributing photographer)

Glenn Bailey, a resident of Encino, spoke in support, encouraging the city to expand the district’s boundaries by jumping across the 405 Freeway to take in land west of the 405, and take “meaningful action for our wildlife.”

Marcia Hanscom, a longtime Sierra Club leader, urged city officials to approve the ordinance as soon as possible. “I hope for future extension of these important planning regulations to include both areas west of the 405 freeway and the coastal areas of Los Angeles,” she said.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

%d bloggers like this: